Image credit: Liane Hentscher/Fox
Insane In The Membrane. Nina (Blair Brown), Peter (Josh Jackson), and Olivia (Anna Torv) had to use their thinkers (and puncture a couple, too) and brainstorm ways to save the parallel universes from William Bell's wrong-headed ambitions in "Brave New World."
Peter and Olivia try to stop William Bell from creating his 'Brave New World' in an episode that sets the stage for the show's final season| Published May 12, 2012
The season finale of Fringe ended with both a birth announcement and a death notice. In the aftermath of a world-saving skirmish with Yaets-quoting wannabe god William Bell that left Olivia Dunham briefly deceased from a bullet to the brain, the Cortexiphan-juiced FBI agent revealed to Peter Bishop that she was pregnant. The Henrietta Cometh! The budding parents hugged; eavesdropping Walter and Astrid beamed. Yet in the very next scene, we saw the elder Bishop burning the midnight oil in the Harvard lab and receiving a visit from a certain fedora-sporting time traveling friend. “We must tell the others,” September said. “They’re coming.” The Observers cometh, too! And with that, Fringe sent us into the hiatus believing that the oppressive liberty-snuffing future seen in “Letters of Transit” remains in play. But will the final season of the sci-fi saga be set in 2036, with Team Bishop Boys leading a revolution against their bald headed, water-swigging rulers? Or will the action be set in the present, with pregnant (or new mom) Olivia and the rest of Fringe division fighting to subvert Observageddon? One thing’s for certain: I’m happy to even be theory-dreaming about one more season of Fringe.
While not the equal of previous season finales, the second part of “Brave New World” was rough and uneven and yet always compelling and altogether good enough. Part of me thinks that “Letters of Transit” would have been a more interesting, buzzy way to conclude the year. Perhaps my biggest disappointment with the finale we got was that it didn’t deal more knowingly with the premise that defined the season: The timeline reboot. The conceit had been downplayed in recent weeks, and the finale only lightly touched on the matter, during a tender scene between Olivia and her (former) foster mother, Nina Sharp. In allowing her Rebootlandia identity to fade away so her original recipe self could take hold, Olivia made the choice to give up the historical, emotional connection she had with Nina. That choice hurt Nina. But it left her with eyes to see the point that I think Fringe was trying to make with the reboot, which seems to be a gloss on the old maxim "the more things change, the more things stay the same," or put another way, a trippy-ironic sci-fi take on the philosophical concept known as "The Best of All Possible Worlds." Here at the end of this controversial reboot year, the relationships as they were have been restored, and the fundamental nature of each character remains the same. Fringe pounded its storytelling world into a warped new shape, just so it could bounce back to its old form. Everything is pretty much in its right place -- at least, the things that actually matter: The people. Was the journey worth the point? I think Fringe fans will be debating this for years, the same way Lost fans argue over season 3 or the way Buffy fans argue over season 6. No, season four of Fringe was not the best season of Fringe, but it deserves huge props for creative boldness, several episodes that were certifiable keepers, and more Emmy-worthy work from the year's MVP cast member, John Noble. But again, I think "Brave New World (Part Two)" should have made a meatier, more explicit summary statement about the reboot. A scene I wanted to see, but didn’t get: Peter acknowledging the long, crazy trip it’s been since the season 3 finale. After all, the younger Bishop’s psychic quantum leap to 2026 via The Doomsday Machine set in motion the chain of events that precipitated to the reboot, which ironically fulfilled the function of The Bridge: To save the “over here” and “over there” universes from destruction. Does Peter still have any memory of his 2025 jaunt? Maybe next season will tell the tale.
The episode opened with Belly and Walter watching an episode of Terra Nova. Wait, sorry: It started with Bell using virtual reality tech to show his old friend and former colleague the new earth he wanted to create, a land before time Eden populated with designer life forms like his freighter ark of animal-human hybrids. (Bell’s scheme owes something to one of the more underrated sci-fi spectaculars in recent memory: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.) To make his New Genesis, Spock Face needed a big bang, and he intended to produce one via the collision of the “over here” and “over there” worlds. Providing the power: Cortexiphan kid Olivia Dunham, tweaking with extraordinary electromagnetic energy. Bell explained that he got the idea to play almighty creator from Walter: Back in the eighties, Bishop invented radical terraforming tech and was tempted to use it in exactly the way Belly was using it now because of his anger toward God over the deaths of both Peters. Walter’s conscience got the better of him, and he asked William to cut those memories out of his brain to prevent him going full-on Dr. Manhattan. Presumably, the resulting damage punched his ticket to St. Claire’s. Bell took up the mad mantle years later after he was diagnosed with lymphoma. He became angry and cynical. He also became convinced that if man was truly made in God’s image, then man’s destiny was to become gods. Or at least, just William Bell.
I’m not sure if I believed everything Bell told us. And I’m not just saying that because Bell’s stated motivations and backstory blow up the elaborate theory that I shared with you last week. My reason for suspicion is the same thing that keeps my speculation alive: “Stasis Runes.” In a bit of business that many of you anticipated (but I did not), we learned that Rebecca Mader’s character, introduced last week, was actually an agent working for William Bell. I’m guessing that her function – whether she knew this or not – was to produce scenarios that would further activate Olivia’s powers. Last week, she played the role of nanite victim; Olivia cured her. Last night, she phoned Olivia, claimed that someone was following her, and asked her to come over to her house. As Jessica baited Agent Dunham, we saw September arrive – and then get snared by “stasis runes,” a golden symbol painted on the floor that was actually technology from the future capable of trapping Observers.
Long story short, Olivia and Peter found September stuck to this hexagonal slab of glyph-marked flooring in the now-abandoned warehouse where Bell was storing his excess animal-human hybrids. Before the heroes could liberate The Observer, Jessica showed up and made a show of shooting September with a weapon devised by Bell for the purpose of killing Observers. She put one bullet into September. When she tried put more into him, Olivia used her telekinetic abilities to deflect them back at Jessica, killing her. Olivia then told the wounded time traveler about their peculiar encounter in “Back To Where You’ve Never Been,” when Bloody September appeared to her and claimed that in every possible world, she had to die. The Observer said he had no memory of that moment in the opera house –because for him, that moment hadn’t happened yet. And with that, Bloody September vanished “into the future” to investigate… and then (presumably) went back in time to The Orpheum to fulfill the time loop, per the rules of bootstrap/predestination paradox.
Burning Question: How did Bell learn to snare and slay Observers? I contend that the central premise of my theory remains valid: That William Bell is leveraging intelligence from the future. But who’s feeding it to him? 2036 Walter? Or could it be September himself? Regardless: I suspect all of this tech will come in very handy next season when our heroes are tasked with averting Observageddon.
NEXT: Down the well with Lost references.